Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. ranks in an above-average position in its peer group, with profitability as the main structural strength, while stability is less supportive than the other dimensions.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Interactive Brokers Group operates a global electronic brokerage platform, enabling clients to trade securities across markets. The company uses a technology-driven approach and automation.
IBKR is priced as a long-term beneficiary of tech disruption. With a sector-leading operating margin of 61%, the market values IBKR’s efficiency and investment in proprietary platform technology. However, the market recalibrates this premium quickly in response to volatility: one-year volatility at 36.5% (notably above peer median) shows that any tech setbacks or delays trigger swift valuation adjustments. Because every innovation confirms the tech-leader narrative, the market prices each quarterly update with heightened expectations compared to a conventional broker. IBKR’s advantage is its automation and platform differentiation, which maintains its position in brokerage technology. A halt in innovation or a technical misstep can sharply reduce the premium.
Break down IBKR's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.