IMCD N.V. ranks below the peer group median, with valuation as the main structural support while profitability remains the clearest constraint. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Price behavior is partially reflecting the structural picture, with a moderate gap remaining.
Discounted for Cyclical Growth Risks
52w drawdown -25.8% · 21d vs sector +3.0%
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
IMCD N.V. is a global distributor of specialty chemicals and ingredients, serving diverse end markets across industries.
The market prices IMCD on lagging growth and margin prospects, not on the expansion potential of top peers. With an operating margin of 7.2% and revenue growth of just 6%, the market assigns IMCD a more cyclical, less premium valuation, actively discounting the stock compared to quality anchors. In chemical distribution, peer valuations are driven by margin and growth signals; IMCD trails Fuchs, RPM, and Sherwin-Williams on these metrics, resulting in a persistent valuation discount. Only a sustained recovery in margins and growth to peer levels over multiple quarters would break the current valuation framing.
Break down IMCD.AS's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.