Home Companies ICG.L
Financial Services · Asset Management · Peer Analysis

ICG plc (ICG.L) — Structural Peer Analysis

ICG plc ranks in the top quartile of its peer group, with stability as the main structural constraint. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Price behavior is partially reflecting the structural picture, with a moderate gap remaining.

Updated 2026-04-05 · STOXX600
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Stability 24
Bottom 25% of peers
Weak Growth 83
Top 10% of peers
Moderate Valuation 87
Top 10% of peers
Strongest Profitability 95
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
76
Peer-Score
Strong peer position
Signal qualityMedium

Explore how ICG.L compares across its peer group

Break down ICG.L's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare ICG.L with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.