Gartner, Inc. ranks in an above-average position in its peer group, with profitability as the main structural strength, while stability is less supportive than the other dimensions. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure.
Discounted for Cyclicality, Not for Quality
52w drawdown -67.5% · 21d vs sector -16.2%
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Gartner provides research and advisory services focused on the IT sector, with a core business in subscription-based insights.
Gartner is priced as a cycle barometer, not a defensive compounder. Despite a 25.1% operating margin indicating efficiency, the market reacts to any dip in Gartner’s heavily subscription-based research revenue by sharply repricing the stock, treating short-term declines as signals for increased volatility—evidenced by a 23.8% one-year drawdown, significantly underperforming peers. The company’s limited diversification intensifies this effect, so Gartner is valued more like a cyclical service provider than a quality compounder. Another quarter of revenue decline is enough to drive further rerating.
Break down IT's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.