CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. ranks below the peer group median, with stability as the main structural pillar while the other dimensions offer less support. Price action is modestly ahead of the structural profile — a mild divergence, not yet a decisive signal.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
CrowdStrike provides AI-driven cybersecurity and identity protection solutions. The company is recognized for rapid product innovation in the security software sector.
CrowdStrike is traded as an AI growth story, not a quality leader. With operating margin at just 6.4%—well below sector median—the market prices in momentum driven by every new product update as a signal for further acceleration, overlooking business weaknesses. CrowdStrike differentiates itself through AI-driven security solutions and aggressive innovation, but the market assigns a high-risk premium to this focus: 1Y volatility stands at 47.1%, placing it at the higher end of peer risk. Because the market rewards momentum and narrative over sustainable profitability, any break in the AI story or a single weak quarter is swiftly reflected in sharp rerating moves.
Break down CRWD's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.