Home Companies CRWD
Technology · Software - Infrastructure · Peer Analysis

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) — Structural Peer Analysis

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. ranks below the peer group median, with stability as the main structural pillar while the other dimensions offer less support. That creates a tension: current price behavior looks stronger than the structural profile would suggest.

Updated 2026-06-14 · NASDAQ100
ENTRY TODAY
Elevated price zoneabove norm
TODAY (5y history)99th pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically elevated range and its multiple is above its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Valuation 27
Below median
Weak Profitability 29
Below median
Moderate Growth 40
Around median
Strongest Stability 79
Top 25% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
41
Peer-Score
Mid-range peer position
Signal qualitylow
Structural Read

Premium Rides on Growth, Not Quality

CrowdStrike provides cloud-based cybersecurity solutions, focusing on endpoint protection and threat intelligence for enterprises.

CRWD is priced as a momentum growth stock, not a quality leader. The market’s focus on AI-driven revenue momentum means weak operating margins—just 4.3%, well below SaaS peers—are overlooked, so even minor growth hiccups can trigger sharp repricing. Despite low profitability, the market continues to assign CRWD a premium valuation, but this is because investors actively price in high volatility: 1Y volatility stands at 47.8%, placing CRWD among the most volatile SaaS stocks. The market reacts swiftly to any disappointment—just a single missed growth quarter is enough to compress the premium abruptly.

AssetNext · 2026-06-03 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how CRWD compares across its peer group

Break down CRWD's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare CRWD with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.