Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation ranks near the peer group median, with valuation as the main structural strength, while growth is less supportive than the other dimensions. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Booz Allen Hamilton provides consulting and technology services, focusing primarily on government clients in the United States. Its business is closely tied to federal budgets and contract cycles.
The market prices Booz Allen Hamilton on near-term growth and contract risks, not on its historical quality record. Despite an operating margin of 9.2%, which is above the sector median, the sharp revenue decline of -6.4% in FY26 indicates that budget cuts and contract cancellations reflect ongoing uncertainty. Because Booz Allen operates as a pure-play government contractor, the market reacts more strongly to political and regulatory shocks than it does for diversified peers, amplifying the impact of such events in the share price. As a result, the market applies a valuation discount to Booz Allen, holding back on re-rating the stock until there is evidence of sustained growth. Only a sustained return to positive revenue growth over at least two quarters and the resolution of regulatory risks could shift the market’s view.
Break down BAH's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.