Bayer Aktiengesellschaft ranks in an above-average position in its peer group, with profitability as the least supportive dimension. That creates a tension: current price behavior looks stronger than the structural profile would suggest.
Discounted for Persistent Weakness, Not Opportunity
52w drawdown 0.0% · 21d vs sector +34.3%
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Bayer Aktiengesellschaft develops pharmaceuticals, crop science products, and consumer health goods.
The market prices Bayer on continued operational weakness and peer underperformance, not on sustainable earning power. With a ROIC of just 2.3%—well below the cost of capital—and an operating margin of 7.1% that continues to slip against competitors, the market consistently discounts Bayer’s shares, reflecting skepticism that the company can deliver sufficient returns. Compared to specialized peers, Bayer is especially exposed to regulatory risks and pricing pressure in crop science and pharmaceuticals, which leads the market to penalize its valuation further and amplify doubts about a near-term recovery in profitability. The market assigns a clear discount, granting no premium for Bayer’s size or diversification. Only a clear turnaround with sustained margin improvement and peer catch-up over multiple quarters would break the current valuation framing.
Break down BAYN.DE's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.