AST SpaceMobile, Inc. ranks below the peer group median, with a split structural profile: strong growth, but very weak profitability and valuation.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
AST SpaceMobile develops satellite-based mobile broadband networks. The company aims to connect standard mobile phones directly to satellites for global coverage.
ASTS is priced as a speculative growth story, not a stable operator. With revenue growth projected at 1505% between 2024 and 2025 but a net loss of $341.9 million expected in 2025, the market assigns a valuation that reacts acutely to every operational update—failures like the BlueBird-7 launch immediately lead to sharp price drops. ASTS is highly dependent on third-party launch providers and subject to regulatory hurdles, which increases the risk of delays or failures. The market incorporates each short-term win or setback directly into the share price, amplifying the impact of any deviation from expectations. Another operational failure or regulatory delay would compress the valuation sharply.
Break down ASTS's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.