Home Companies APH
Technology · Electronic Components · Peer Analysis

Amphenol Corporation (APH) — Structural Peer Analysis

Amphenol Corporation ranks in an above-average position in its peer group, with a broadly solid and relatively even profile. The market is broadly confirming the structural profile.

Updated 2026-07-05 · RUSSELL1000
ENTRY TODAY
Elevated price zoneabove norm
TODAY (5y history)99th pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically elevated range and its multiple is above its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Valuation 51
Above median
Weak Growth 58
Above median
Moderate Stability 64
Above median
Strongest Profitability 70
Top 25% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
61
Peer-Score
Above-average peer position
Signal qualitylow
Structural Read

Premium Rides on AI Cycle, Not Steady Compound

Amphenol Corporation designs and manufactures electronic connectors and interconnect systems for a range of industries, including IT and datacom. The company is a key supplier to AI and datacenter infrastructure projects.

Amphenol is priced as an AI-driven growth lever, not a defensive compounder. With a 27.3% operating margin well above the peer median, the business quality is clear, but the market prices the stock to react sharply to shifts in the AI and datacenter cycle—reflected in 41.8% one-year volatility that underscores the sector’s boom-bust rhythm. As a leading IT datacom supplier, Amphenol benefits uniquely from AI and datacenter investment waves, and the market’s focus on these themes means the share price responds directly to narrative changes, not just operational results. A single weak quarter in the AI segment is enough to trigger abrupt repricing.

AssetNext · 2026-06-18 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how APH compares across its peer group

Break down APH's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare APH with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.