Alstom SA ranks among the weaker positions in its peer group, with profitability as the least supportive dimension. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Price action is lagging the structural profile — current market behavior is not yet confirming the structural position.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Alstom SA designs and manufactures rail transport equipment and integrated mobility solutions, including trains, signaling systems, and related services.
The market prices Alstom on turnaround progress and project risk, not on sustainable margin strength like its peers. With an EBIT margin of just 6.0% for FY25/26—well below sector standards—and a persistently weak peer score of 29/100, the market penalizes Alstom for its operational track record. Because repeated project execution issues continue to pressure margins, the market applies a significant discount to Alstom, directly reflecting the elevated risk it perceives in the turnaround case. In the rail sector, consistent project delivery is critical; Alstom stands out from peers due to operational weaknesses and an ongoing transformation. Only a visible and sustained margin improvement over at least two reporting periods would change this turnaround framing.
Break down ALO.PA's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.