25 companies with high margin and capital efficiency comparable to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) — identified by structural trajectory analysis, not sector labels alone.
Score range used for matching: 35–59
Ranked by closeness of quality score to RCL's reference score of 47. Delta shown in parentheses.
| # | Company | Margin & Quality Profile | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |
DTE · Utilities
similar →
|
47(+0) |
Analysis |
| #2 |
FSLR · Technology
similar →
|
47(+0) |
RCL vs FSLR Analysis |
| #3 |
ADI · Technology
similar →
|
47(+0) |
Analysis |
| #4 |
MS · Financial Services
similar →
|
47(+0) |
Analysis |
| #5 |
NDA-FI.HE · Financial Services
similar →
|
47(+0) |
Analysis |
| #6 |
KESKOB.HE · Consumer Defensive
similar →
|
47(+0) |
Analysis |
| #7 |
LTMC.MI · Consumer Cyclical
similar →
|
47(+0) |
Analysis |
| #8 |
SO · Utilities
similar →
|
47(+0) |
Analysis |
| #9 |
ITT · Industrials
similar →
|
47(+0) |
Analysis |
| #10 |
KR · Consumer Defensive
similar →
|
47(+0) |
Analysis |
| #11 |
SFSN.SW · Industrials
similar →
|
47(+0) |
Analysis |
| #12 |
NDA.DE · Industrials
similar →
|
48(+1) |
Analysis |
| #13 |
GSK.L · Healthcare
similar →
|
46(−1) |
Analysis |
| #14 |
JBHT · Industrials
similar →
|
48(+1) |
Analysis |
| #15 |
RYA.IR · Industrials
similar →
|
46(−1) |
Analysis |
| #16 |
COP · Energy
similar →
|
48(+1) |
Analysis |
| #17 |
LECO · Industrials
similar →
|
46(−1) |
Analysis |
| #18 |
INCH.L · Consumer Cyclical
similar →
|
48(+1) |
Analysis |
| #19 |
WTB.L · Consumer Cyclical
similar →
|
48(+1) |
RCL vs WTB.L Analysis |
| #20 |
SAX.DE · Communication Services
similar →
|
46(−1) |
Analysis |
Interactive peer comparison, trajectory view and live data for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd..
Trajectory similarity is rule-based and descriptive — not investment advice. Companies are matched by score proximity on a single dimension; this does not imply equivalence across all financial characteristics. Based on peer-relative structural scores in the AssetNext universe.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.