Home Similar Companies Similar to RF Valuation Profile
Trajectory Analysis · Valuation Profile

Companies with a Regions Financial Corporation-like Valuation Profile

25 companies with similar peer-relative valuation positioning comparable to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) — identified by structural trajectory analysis, not sector labels alone.

Reference score: 84 · Updated 2026-04-05 · All companies similar to RF →

Reference
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
Valuation Profile score
84

Score range used for matching: 72–96

Companies with a similar peer-relative valuation to Regions Financial Corporation

Ranked by closeness of valuation score to RF's reference score of 84. Delta shown in parentheses.

# Company Valuation Profile
#1
RMD · Healthcare similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#2
AU · Basic Materials similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#3
BATS.L · Consumer Defensive similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#4
WKL.AS · Industrials similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#5
CNA.L · Utilities similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#6
DECK · Consumer Cyclical similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#7
NEM · Basic Materials similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#8
PGR · Financial Services similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#9
SBAC · Real Estate similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#10
AEP · Utilities similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#11
HCA · Healthcare similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#12
PRX.AS · Consumer Cyclical similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#13
JMAT.L · Basic Materials similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#14
LDOS · Technology similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#15
PRU.L · Financial Services similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#16
BMW.DE · Consumer Cyclical similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#17
AKZA.AS · Basic Materials similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#18
BLND.L · Real Estate similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#19
AMUN.PA · Financial Services similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#20
SYY · Consumer Defensive similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
Compare RF with trajectory matches
Other RF trajectory pages

Full trajectory analysis in AssetNext

Interactive peer comparison, trajectory view and live data for Regions Financial Corporation.

Explore RF in AssetNext →

Trajectory similarity is rule-based and descriptive — not investment advice. Companies are matched by score proximity on a single dimension; this does not imply equivalence across all financial characteristics. Based on peer-relative structural scores in the AssetNext universe.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.