Home Similar Companies Similar to PHP.L Margin & Quality Profile
Trajectory Analysis · Margin & Quality Profile

Companies with a Primary Health Properties Plc-like Margin & Quality Profile

25 companies with high margin and capital efficiency comparable to Primary Health Properties Plc (PHP.L) — identified by structural trajectory analysis, not sector labels alone.

Reference score: 93 · Updated 2026-05-17 · All companies similar to PHP.L →

Reference
PHP.L
Primary Health Properties Plc
Margin & Quality Profile score
93

Score range used for matching: 81–100

Companies with a similar margin and capital efficiency profile to Primary Health Properties Plc

Ranked by closeness of quality score to PHP.L's reference score of 93. Delta shown in parentheses.

# Company Margin & Quality Profile
#1
MA · Financial Services similar →
93(+0)
Analysis
#2
DPZ · Consumer Cyclical similar →
93(+0)
Analysis
#3
ANET · Technology similar →
93(+0)
Analysis
#4
EIX · Utilities similar →
93(+0)
Analysis
#5
EXO.AS · Industrials similar →
93(+0)
Analysis
#6
MLI · Industrials similar →
92(−1)
Analysis
#7
PEG · Utilities similar →
92(−1)
Analysis
#8
UCG.MI · Financial Services similar →
94(+1)
Analysis
#9
CVC.AS · Financial Services similar →
94(+1)
Analysis
#10
NVDA · Technology similar →
92(−1)
Analysis
#11
III.L · Financial Services similar →
92(−1)
Analysis
#12
FBK.MI · Financial Services similar →
94(+1)
Analysis
#13
MMM · Industrials similar →
94(+1)
Analysis
#14
ANTO.L · Basic Materials similar →
92(−1)
Analysis
#15
ENR.DE · Industrials similar →
94(+1)
Analysis
#16
NOVO-B.CO · Healthcare similar →
91(−2)
Analysis
#17
JPM · Financial Services similar →
91(−2)
Analysis
#18
AAPL · Technology similar →
91(−2)
Analysis
#19
GOOGL · Communication Services similar →
91(−2)
Analysis
#20
COV.PA · Real Estate similar →
95(+2)
Analysis
Compare PHP.L with trajectory matches
Other PHP.L trajectory pages

Full trajectory analysis in AssetNext

Interactive peer comparison, trajectory view and live data for Primary Health Properties Plc.

Explore PHP.L in AssetNext →

Trajectory similarity is rule-based and descriptive — not investment advice. Companies are matched by score proximity on a single dimension; this does not imply equivalence across all financial characteristics. Based on peer-relative structural scores in the AssetNext universe.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.