Home Similar Companies Similar to MSFT Valuation Profile
Trajectory Analysis · Valuation Profile

Companies with a Microsoft Corporation-like Valuation Profile

25 companies with similar peer-relative valuation positioning comparable to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) — identified by structural trajectory analysis, not sector labels alone.

Reference score: 82 · Updated 2026-04-05 · All companies similar to MSFT →

Reference
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
Valuation Profile score
82

Score range used for matching: 70–94

Companies with a similar peer-relative valuation to Microsoft Corporation

Ranked by closeness of valuation score to MSFT's reference score of 82. Delta shown in parentheses.

# Company Valuation Profile
#1
BKNG · Consumer Cyclical similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#2
TLX.DE · Financial Services similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#3
CTRA · Energy similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#4
UCG.MI · Financial Services similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#5
UTHR · Healthcare similar →
82(+0)
MSFT vs UTHR Analysis
#6
DVA · Healthcare similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#7
CPRT · Industrials similar →
82(+0)
MSFT vs CPRT Analysis
#8
RPM · Basic Materials similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#9
UNI.MC · Financial Services similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#10
CI · Healthcare similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#11
PSX · Energy similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#12
AVB · Real Estate similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#13
ZTS · Healthcare similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#14
IQV · Healthcare similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#15
RJF · Financial Services similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#16
AIG · Financial Services similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#17
CCEP · Consumer Defensive similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#18
INVP.L · Financial Services similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#19
CON.DE · Consumer Cyclical similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
#20
VID.MC · Consumer Cyclical similar →
82(+0)
Analysis
Compare MSFT with trajectory matches
Other MSFT trajectory pages

Full trajectory analysis in AssetNext

Interactive peer comparison, trajectory view and live data for Microsoft Corporation.

Explore MSFT in AssetNext →

Trajectory similarity is rule-based and descriptive — not investment advice. Companies are matched by score proximity on a single dimension; this does not imply equivalence across all financial characteristics. Based on peer-relative structural scores in the AssetNext universe.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.